wwe raw 11 January 2016 Full Show
The name for “Raw” was disputed in June 2009 when Muscle Flex Inc., a Los Angeles-based fitness company, had taken legal action against the WWE after a court ruled that some of WWE’s trademarks related to Raw were similar enough to theIn the Raw trademark that they caused confusion among Canadians On June 18, 2008, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office then issued a final decision that found certain wares listed in the trademark application from WWE (No. 1,153, 018) were confusingly similar and thus lacked distinctiveness from the Muscle Flex trademark, which Muscle Flex is in the process of acquiring. The WWE appealed the CIPO’s ruling to the Federal Court of Canada, but failed to file the required documents by the deadline.
0 comments:
Post a Comment